How questions matter
Tuesday, March 24th, 2009The Green Inc. blog over at The NYTimes notes the results of a recent Gallup poll which reveals, for the first time in 25 years, that more Americans believe that economic growth should be given priority over the environment, even if that means the environment suffers.
Here’s my question–why do these options need to be mutually exclusive? The poll, in effect, reinforces the canard that protecting the environment means sacrificing economic prosperity. I understand why people (mostly Republicans and some Independents, as it turns out) would respond as they did, given the severe recession. But aren’t the underlying causes of this crisis rooted in unsustainable business practices? Long-term economic solutions must come from doing things differently, not perpetuating the false choices that have gotten us into this mess.
My quibble isn’t so much with the respondents, but with the premise of the question. It–and others like it–validates and perpetuates a destructive meme. As long as it sticks around, it will undermine perception of the environment as our best opportunity for sustainable economic investment and growth.
As much as the environment, green technology, sustainable investing and the like have entered the mainstream conversation in recent years, polls like this one demonstrate those issues are still the exception rather than the norm. When Gallup no longer deems the economy vs. environment question to be relevant, it’ll be a clear signal that our public discourse and communications have fundamentally changed.




